Mistakes With Robotic Surgery Not The Fault Of Device Makers

Posted on

It’s funny to think about it this way, but robotic surgery has been around for many years now. It seems like the phrase “robotic surgery” should be idea that won’t be realized until the not-so-distant (or, maybe, very distant) future. But it’s here, today, and doctors and surgeons use devices and new technology on patients that appear as though they should be in a science-fiction movie.

But all weirdness aside: who takes the blame when a mistake is made during surgery that involves robotic devices? Does the medical device maker hold the liability? The surgeon? The hospital? A combination of these parties?

In a surprising case, a court ruled that a medical device maker was actually not liable for a surgery gone wrong when their medical device was used during the procedure. The logic was that since it was a doctor that was trained to use the device, the fault actually was with the hospital (for not properly training the doctor) and the doctor (for making the mistake).

This decision has been appealed though. Medical professionals say it opens up a “blind spot” in malpractice litigation. There is not much in terms of guidelines for how hospitals are supposed to train their doctors on robotic surgery. The lack of regulation and rules seems to be born out of the “new” factor associated with these devices.

No matter the reason for all of this, it goes without saying that the medical community needs to figure out how these robotic devices are supposed to be used, and then institute effective training techniques that give medical professionals all the knowledge they need to use these devices.

Source: Media Health Leaders, “Technological Change Creates a ‘Blind Spot’ in Physician Credentialing,” April 24, 2015

Recent BlogPosts

  • April, 2024

    Significance of Family History in Delayed Cancer Diagnosis

    You may wonder why your doctor’s office has you fill out forms asking about diseases your relatives have had. Family history provides indications to physicians about some diseases and conditions, perhaps the most extreme of which is cancer. As such, it is invaluable for those seeking medical care and those providing it, to understand the […]

    READ MORE
  • February, 2024

    Common Forms of Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Doctor Malpractice and When You May Have Grounds for a Lawsuit

    If you have ever had sleep issues, allergies, neck cancer, or skin disorders, you may have sought diagnostic and treatment help from an Ear, Nose, and Throat specialist, known as an ENT. An ENT specializes in otolaryngology, the study of ear, nose, and throat conditions. In essence, these doctors treat diseases and disorders of the […]

    READ MORE
  • January, 2024

    The Complex Relationship Between Religion and Medical Malpractice

    The United States Constitution protects religious freedom. Although the nation is historically Judeo-Christian, people of all faiths practice their religions throughout the American landscape. In the last half-century, federal and state laws and policies increasingly bolstered religious protections, especially in medicine. Conscience laws allow medical practitioners to refuse medical care under certain circumstances when their […]

    READ MORE

Free Case
Evaluation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Officelocations