Compensation For Injuries Resulting From A Dangerous Product

Posted on

“Products liability” is the legal term for holding those responsible who manufacture, produce, design or market a product that — due to the fault of one of the providers of the product — injures one or more of its users. It is not only the manufacturer of the product that can be held liable, but depending on the circumstances also designers, distributors or retailers.

State law varies on the requirements an injured consumer must meet in order to successfully prove a product liability case. In order to bring a successful lawsuit in New Jersey, for example, the injured person must prove that the product that caused harm was:

  • Not reasonably safe for its intended use
  • Dangerous when it left the control of the defendant
  • Not significantly changed after it left control of the defendant
  • Used by the consumer in a way that the defendant could foresee
  • The reason the consumer was injured

In addition to proving all of the above, the injured person might be required to show how the product is “defective.” For example, the product could be dangerous because it was manufactured incorrectly, was designed defectively, or because the defendant did not properly warn consumers of the product’s intended use or inherent dangers.

Bars To Recovery

Even if all the above requirements are met, there are other reasons that prevent an injured consumer from recovering compensation. For example, determining what uses are “foreseeable” with a product can be very difficult. Legally, whether the use of the product is foreseeable is an objective test; this means that whether or not the defendant literally foresaw the use of the object in a way that injured the consumer is irrelevant. For example: a person stands on a chair to reach an object and subsequently the chair breaks. How often do people stand on chairs? A jury would have to decide if a chair manufacturer, who knows that a chair is incapable of handling a person standing up, would be liable for injuries if an individual used the chair to reach an object.

Another bar to recovery occurs when the injured consumer assumed the risk. This occurs if a person knowingly uses or participates in a product or activity that he or she knows is inherently dangerous. For example, an individual who is injured while riding a motorcycle at dangerous speed cannot claim that the manufacturer was at fault for making a dangerous product. However, if the motorcycle had a defective design or was made incorrectly, a consumer can obtain recovery if the consumer wasn’t aware of the defect.

Contact An Attorney

Because state laws vary and individual circumstances are unique, those injured by the use of a product should seek the advice of a personal injury attorney experienced in product liability cases to determine whether they may qualify for compensation.

Recent BlogPosts

  • February, 2024

    Common Forms of Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Doctor Malpractice and When You May Have Grounds for a Lawsuit

    If you have ever had sleep issues, allergies, neck cancer, or skin disorders, you may have sought diagnostic and treatment help from an Ear, Nose, and Throat specialist, known as an ENT. An ENT specializes in otolaryngology, the study of ear, nose, and throat conditions. In essence, these doctors treat diseases and disorders of the […]

    READ MORE
  • January, 2024

    The Complex Relationship Between Religion and Medical Malpractice

    The United States Constitution protects religious freedom. Although the nation is historically Judeo-Christian, people of all faiths practice their religions throughout the American landscape. In the last half-century, federal and state laws and policies increasingly bolstered religious protections, especially in medicine. Conscience laws allow medical practitioners to refuse medical care under certain circumstances when their […]

    READ MORE
  • January, 2024

    The Legal Team at Fronzuto Law Group Obtains $1 Million in Damages for Negligent Nerve Block Injuries 

    Improper Implementation of a Nerve Block Before Surgery Leads to Permanent Disability One of Fronzuto Law Group’s latest medical malpractice case victories concerns the negligent performance of a nerve block prior to shoulder surgery, which ultimately left an otherwise healthy 46-year-old woman permanently disabled. While the woman was scheduled for a relatively standard surgical procedure […]

    READ MORE

Free Case
Evaluation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Officelocations