Plaintiffs in Product Liability Lawsuit Against Bayer Claim Failure to Warn

Posted on

Birth Control Implant Lawsuit Help in NJ

birth control implant lawsuit attorneys NJAfter a series of product liability lawsuits claiming Bayer Corp. failed to warn patients about the potential risks associated with one of its birth control implants, a California judge recently granted a motion to allow for coordination among the plaintiffs’ cases. This significant decision will allow plaintiffs and their attorneys to share information, pool resources, and gain traction as they move forward.

Have you or a loved one suffered injury because of a birth control implant or other defective medical device? The New Jersey attorneys at our firm have the knowledge and skill you need now. At Fronzuto Law Group, we concentrate our practice on product liability and medical malpractice litigation, aggressively advocating for injured victims and their families in New Jersey and New York. To discuss your potential claim and find the answers to your questions, contact our New Jersey offices at 973-435-4551 for a cost-free initial consultation.

Failure to Warn about Birth Control Products

Failure to warn is one of the most common types of product liability litigation. The law requires that medical device manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies inform medical professionals of the potential risks associated with their products. If they inform doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals who prescribe or use their products of these risks, medical professionals are then required to inform their patients. In product liability failure to warn cases, it is essential identify where negligence lies. In other words, was it the manufacturer or the medical professional who failed to fulfill their duty? An experienced product liability attorney can assist with determining fault and advocating for those injured by dangerous products.

Wasn’t Informed of the Risk of a Birth Control Implant

The medical device in this case is the Essure birth control implant, manufactured by Bayer Corp. The underlying argument among the plaintiffs is that Bayer failed to inform medical professionals and the FDA that the implant may pose dangerous health risks, including chronic pain, bleeding, a perforated uterus, and unintended pregnancy.

As for the Food and Drug Administration, this regulatory body enforces the safety standards associated with pharmaceutical drugs and devices. If a manufacturer fails to inform the FDA when findings of potential risks exist, the manufacturer can be held liable for injuries to the innocent patients who utilized their products. In other cases, a manufacturers’ failure to comply with the labeling requirements imposed by the FDA can lead to product liability claims. However, simply providing the appropriate labels does not absolve a medical device or implant manufacturer from liability for failure to warn.

For additional information pertaining to this case, access the following article: In Win for Plaintiffs, Oakland Judge Takes Control of Bayer Suits

Recent BlogPosts

  • February, 2024

    Common Forms of Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) Doctor Malpractice and When You May Have Grounds for a Lawsuit

    If you have ever had sleep issues, allergies, neck cancer, or skin disorders, you may have sought diagnostic and treatment help from an Ear, Nose, and Throat specialist, known as an ENT. An ENT specializes in otolaryngology, the study of ear, nose, and throat conditions. In essence, these doctors treat diseases and disorders of the […]

    READ MORE
  • January, 2024

    The Complex Relationship Between Religion and Medical Malpractice

    The United States Constitution protects religious freedom. Although the nation is historically Judeo-Christian, people of all faiths practice their religions throughout the American landscape. In the last half-century, federal and state laws and policies increasingly bolstered religious protections, especially in medicine. Conscience laws allow medical practitioners to refuse medical care under certain circumstances when their […]

    READ MORE
  • January, 2024

    The Legal Team at Fronzuto Law Group Obtains $1 Million in Damages for Negligent Nerve Block Injuries 

    Improper Implementation of a Nerve Block Before Surgery Leads to Permanent Disability One of Fronzuto Law Group’s latest medical malpractice case victories concerns the negligent performance of a nerve block prior to shoulder surgery, which ultimately left an otherwise healthy 46-year-old woman permanently disabled. While the woman was scheduled for a relatively standard surgical procedure […]

    READ MORE

Free Case
Evaluation

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Officelocations