Defective Medical Device Leaves Patients In Limbo

Posted on

When a product is recalled because it is defective, the recall generally involves having consumers stop using the product and pulling it from shelves. However, in the case of a recalled medical device that has been implanted inside of a person’s body, what choices does the patient have?

This is the question currently being faced by more than 75,000 patients who have a flawed medical device implanted in their chests. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently recalled a defibrillator manufactured by St. Jude Medical. The concern was over potential risks of personal injury and wrongful death because its wires have broken free from the outer insulation. If this happens, the patient is at risk of receiving an unnecessary shock to the heart, or of not receiving the necessary jolt when there is an irregular heartbeat.

For now, these patients must be monitored by their doctors to ensure that the defective leads to the defibrillator do not become broken. To make matters challenging, in some cases it can be impossible to detect if there has been a breach in the wires even with the help of an x-ray.

There is definitely a serious need for more information concerning this defective medical product as right now there appears to be very little data on who may be at risk of injury. Since the medical device was recalled, it will also be difficult to give patients advice as to their safest course of action.

So this means that patients are left with three options:

•1. Leave the faulty lead connected to the defibrillator

•2. Disconnect the flawed wires and insert new wires

•3. Take the device out of the patient’s body

Surgery is certainly not easy option, and may even be dangerous to the patient. In fact, it could cause damage to the heart itself. Unfortunately, all of these options are less than ideal, posing uncertainty for patients who now must decide how to proceed.

Source: Star Tribune, “A flawed device brings a tough choice for Riata patients,” James Walsh, March 10, 2012

Recent BlogPosts

  • July, 2024

    The Predictive Value of Prior Medical Malpractice Payouts to Determine Future Claims Against Doctors

    Exploring the Odds of New Medical Malpractice Allegations Against Physicians with a History of Paid Claims A physician may face one medical malpractice lawsuit and believe that the incident is a one-time occurrence. After settling the claim, they may vow to be more careful to avoid another situation leading to negligence allegations moving forward. If […]

  • June, 2024

    Determining a Medical Malpractice Settlement Amount in NJ

    Medical malpractice can occur in a myriad of ways. The fundamental premise in these cases involves physicians, hospitals, medical facilities, or other healthcare professionals providing substandard care that causes victims injuries. Typically, physicians, nurses, lab technicians, and other healthcare staff make unacceptable errors regarding diagnosis, laboratory test results, surgery, medication, aftercare, hospital (or other medical […]

  • June, 2024

    Filing a Lawsuit for Tepezza-Related Hearing Loss

    Current Status of Tepezza Litigation – Class Action Lawsuit for Tepezza Numerous lawsuits against Horizon Therapeutics, the makers of Tepezza, are currently coordinated in multidistrict litigation (MDL) in federal court. The class action lawsuits arise from the drug’s connection to detrimental side effects, which include hearing loss, deafness, and tinnitus. The link between Tepezza and […]


Free Case

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.